Wiki Assignment COMM
146
This wiki assignment proved to be a little more challenging
than the one I did in COMM 100B. This assignment had an extra component to it,
relating it back to feminism and technology. I am particularly interested in
law so I wanted to do this assignment on a law case. At first, I wanted to edit
the wiki article on Roe v. Wade. Unfortunately, the article was locked and you
had to request access to edit it. I am assuming that because of the large
amounts of controversy behind it, Wikipedia has taken extra precautions in who
can edit the article. So I decided to edit Planned Parenthood v. Casey, another
controversial case, tied in with Roe v. Wade. This is kind of the overlooked
abortion case and has greater precedent than Roe v. Wade.
The law is a very interesting thing. A lot of people think
that it is neutral in all aspects of life. However, a closer analysis of the
law shows that it is patriarchal. The Supreme Court has had four female
justices in its existence, which means that most of the opinion writing is
based on male perspective. Especially with abortion, there is a lot of male
perspective. After reading the Wikipedia article on Planned Parenthood v.
Casey, I realized that women are not really mentioned in the article. The law
treats women as a commodity, something that can be bartered. I sought to change
that discourse with my two edits. The first in adding the first paragraph above
and then second adding the second sentence in the paragraph talking about the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals decision. I wanted to add these two edits
because I feel that it brought out a different perspective on this case, that
it is not just about whether an abortion is constitutional, but about women,
treating them with respect and not an object. The liberty of women is rarely
mentioned in this Wikipedia article, if not at all, and I wanted to bring that
out.
You were wise to choose a lesser known abortion case, but one that Wikipedia had identified as important and in need of editorial interventions. The kinds of additions that you made to this case clearly were helpful and have "stuck." I think adding the mention of Alito (and cross referencing him) was particularly significant, given the Supreme Court that we have today.
ReplyDelete