Sunday, May 19, 2013

Assembling Face -- Reflection 1/3 (MSJ) Made-Up


This is the first of three responses I wrote about our object project "Assembling Face." //MSJ
--



You are made up. Well, you’re halfway made up. You are a performance and your character is a split woman. The right side of you is bright and shiny. Emphasized. Your cheekbone bold, your eye color lucid in contrast to a blackened fringe of lash and a shimmery lid. The jagged scar over your upper lip is gently blotted into skin color, though your skin is still raised. The bluish tone under your eye and around your socket is concealed. Makeup performs erasure and emphasis. “You look great.”

Your left side is blurry. Your pigment dulls at the edge of your facial features. For instance, your eye is small inside the socket, your lips blend into your chin, and your nose is red. “What’s wrong?” people ask you when you aren’t made up. “Are you not feeling well?”

Your two-sided face signals this two-faced social reception. It’s okay, you can feel irritated by this polarity. It is irritating to be asked if you are ill when in fact you simply didn’t engage in the feminine activity of painting your face. You wonder: do people so believe in constructed appearances of erasure and emphasis that they are evaluating my wellness and normalcy based on my under eye brow? 

Probably not everyone, you hope.

As a girl, makeup was fun. Playful. You experimented with makeup with your friends. And you performed in theater and ballet performances where makeup signaled the ‘big day.’  Makeup was an exciting mask: permission for boldness, changing characters, being on stage.

Now, how do you feel? Do you different from one side to the other? Or from one day to the next? Do you grimace when you see photos of yourself without makeup, particularly as you age? In wearing makeup do you think you’re performing a theatrical act of wellness or playfulness or do you actually feel more comfortable when your blemishes are concealed from others and your eyelashes are emphasized? (Let’s analyze you. Your own response is part of the performance, too, you know.)

Yes, it’s true that gone are the days when a white woman’s face made up with makeup signaled looseness. At least, those days are gone as long as you’ve applied certain kinds of makeup in specific ways. Because even if you despise the fact that women can be blamed for adverse social treatment because of the way that they look, you also know you aren't exaggerating or contorting for fun or drag. (Are you scared?)

You've been one class shy of department store femininity – an unconscious embodiment of mainstream beauty magazines advising you on how to appear “natural” in a very typical, white North American woman-kind of way. You know the privileges that are afforded to you for doing this, and you comply with the rules -- enough makeup to appear 'normal' but not too much. Though you are grateful that you’re not around people who judge you too harshly for your look alone, you have to admit to yourself that you like the times when someone tells you that you look great. And you often tell people this, too. (You’re not innocent).

What’s the meaning of assembling a face using makeup? This question isn’t about deciding whether or not dolling yourself up is either emboldening and or repressive. Nor is it about whether or not concealments and emphases are coded as meaningful. (They are not, of course, devoid of meaning). The question you have about assembling face is how what it is you face with your face depends on who is looking and when they’re looking, and how your own interpretation of these looks shape how you look -- and look back.

Wikipedia entry - Freelancer

During our course I've found myself reflecting on a long-held research interest of mine, gender and work. I decided to 'storm' the Wikipedia page on Freelancer to include important, if depressing, details about freelance labor I've gathered in my own research.**

When I came across the Freelancer page initially, it was haphazardly done. The sections were incomplete, the content was way too positive, and to my dismay the page didn't even include any "flags" regarding these weaknesses. My contributions to it took me four+ (!!) hours to do and they are  no where near the comprehensive overhaul the page could use. I could write a dissertation on freelance work (maybe I will!). Much of what I added was drawn from research I'd conducted in the past on freelance writers.

I'm pasting my interventions below. In summary, I added the "Demographics" and "Freelance Practices and Compensation" sections. I heavily edited the "Benefits" and "Drawbacks" sections, and moved them around. Since material was already in these sections, which I edited, be aware that not all the writing is mine. But aside from the infographic (which I have problems with, but didn't replace at this time), all the citations are mine. I drew from research reports conducted by freelance associations, newspaper articles, blog commentary, and scholarship on gender, media, freelancing and working from home by feminist scholars such as Melissa Gregg (UCI) and others contributing to the journal Feminist Media Studies. What's left to do? Lots. The legal section could use some additions and clarifications -- particularly around 'work for hire' -- as could the section on 'impact of the internet." I'm saving these interventions for rainy day.

**In earlier entry I said I was going to write a page for Tizianna Terranova. This is still on my radar and a beginning for her page is still in my Sandbox. However, I decided to intervene in this existing page, Freelancer, for this project mostly because I found the page wanting for detail and I know and have collected details which I thought would greatly improve the page. I decided my time would be best spent contributing to an existing topical page rather than starting from scratch, though Tizianna Terranova's page certainly should get made, in good time, another rainy day project.

//MSJ

Freelance practices and compensation [edit]

What sort of work do freelancers do? While freelancers span a range of industries, many are engaged in media industries. According to the 2012 Freelance Industry Report compiled primarily about North America freelancing, nearly half of freelancers do writing work, with 18% of freelancers listing writing as a skill, 10% as editor/copyeditors, and 10% as copywriters. Twenty percent of freelancers listed their primary skills as design. Next on the list were translator (8%), web developer (4.5%), and marketing professional (4%).[1]Elance, a web platform that connects freelancers with contractors, surveyed its members and 39% listed writing and editing are their main skill set.[2]
Depending on the industry, freelance work practices vary and have changed over time. In some industries such as consulting, freelancers may require clients to sign writtencontracts. While in journalism or writing, freelancers may work for free or do work "on spec" to build their reputations or a relationship with a publication.[3] Some freelancers may provide written estimates of work and request deposits from clients.
Payment for freelance work also depends on industry, skills, and experience. Freelancers may charge by the day, hour, a piece rate, or on a per-project basis. Instead of a flat rate or fee, some freelancers have adopted a value-based pricing method based on the perceived value of the results to the client. By custom, payment arrangements may be upfront, percentage upfront, or upon completion. For more complex projects, a contract may set a payment schedule based on milestones or outcomes. One of the drawbacks of freelancing is that there is no guarantee payment, and the work can be highly precarious.
In writing and other artistic fields, "freelance" and its derivative terms are often reserved for workers who create works on their own initiative and then seek a publisher. They typically retain the copyright to their works and sell the rights to publishers in time-limited contracts. People who create intellectual property under a work for hire situation (according to the publishers' or other customers' specifications) are sometimes referred to as "independent contractors" or other similar terms. Creators give up their rights to their works in a "works made for hire" situation, a category of intellectual property defined in U.S. copyright law — Section 101, Copyright Act of 1976 (17 USC §101). The protection of the intellectual property rights that give the creator of the work are considered to have been sold in toto in a work for hire agreement. A "work for hire" arrangement is similar to the control that employers have over the creations of employees, however in a contractual rather than employment relationship.[4]

Demographics [edit]

According to the most recent report on independent contractors published by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were approximately 10.3 million US workers (7.4% of the workforce) independent contractors in 2005.[5] This number has grown since, though estimates vary. For instance, Jeffrey Eisenach, an economist at George Mason University, estimated in 2011 the number of freelancers had grown by one million since 2005.[6] While in 2012, the Aberdeen Group, a private research company, estimated that 26% (approx. 81 million) of the United States population was is a part of the contingent workforce, a category of casual labor that includes freelancing.[7] In 2013, theFreelancers Union estimated that 1 in 3 workers in the United States are self-employed (approx. 42 million), with more than four million (43 percent) of those self-employed workers members of the creative class, a strata of work associated with freelance industries, such as knowledge workers, technologists, professional writers, artists, entertainers, and media workers.[8]
Freelancing is a gendered form of work.[9] The 2012 Freelance Industry Report estimates that more than 71% of freelancers are women between the ages of 30-50. Surveys of other specific areas of freelancing have similar trends. Demographic research on Amazon Mechanical Turk reveals that the majority of North American Mechanical Turk crowd workers are women[10] Catherine McKercher's research on journalism as a profession has showcased that while media organizations are still male dominated, the reverse is true for freelance journalists and editors, whose ranks are mainly women.[11]

Benefits [edit]

Freelancers do not have one singular reason for freelancing. According to the 2012 Freelance Industry Report, men and women respondents freelance for different reasons. Female survey respondents indicated that they prefer the scheduling freedom and flexibility that freelancing offers, while male survey respondents indicated they freelance to follow or pursue personal passions.[12] Freelancing is also taken up by workers who have been laid-off, who cannot find full-time employment,[13] or for those industries such as journalism which are relying increasingly on contingent labor rather than full-time staff. [14] In interviews and on blogs about freelancing, freelancers list choice and flexibility as a benefit. One interviewee says he likes how the flexible hours let him take his sick mother to the doctor and give him time to see his children. As for the work, he said "I can turn down projects" that bore him.[15]
Sometimes a freelancer will work with one or more other freelancers and/or vendors to form a "virtual agency" to serve a particular client's needs for short-term and permanent project work.[citation needed] This versatile agency model can help a freelancer land jobs that require targeted, specific experience and skills outside the scope of one individual. As the clients change, so too may the players chosen for a virtual agency's talent base. This is a common way for freelancers to get work if the non-competing freelancer in the relationship reciprocates the relevant type of work back assuming that both are in the same industry.[citation needed]

Drawbacks [edit]

Traditional Freelance Work System
Freelancing, like other forms of causal labor, can be precarious work. Websites, books, portals and organizations for freelancers often feature advice on getting and keeping a steady work stream.[16] In addition to the lack of job security, many freelancers also report the ongoing hassle of dealing with employers who don't pay on time and the possibility of long periods without work. Additionally, freelancers do not receive employment benefits such as a pensionsick leave, paid holidays, bonuses or health insurance, which can be a serious hardship for freelancers residing in countries such as the US without universal health care.[17]
Freelancers often earn less than their employed counterparts. While most freelancers have at least ten years of experience prior to working independently,[18] experienced freelancers do not always earn an income equal to that of full-time employment. For instance, according to research conducted in 2005 by the Professional Writers Association of Canada on Canadian journalists and editors, there is a wage gap between staff and freelance journalists. While the typical Canadian full-time freelancer is female, between 35-55, holding a college diploma and often a graduate degree, she typically earns about $29,999 Canadian dollars before taxes. Meanwhile a staff journalist of similar age and experience level working full-time at outlets such as the Ottawa Citizen or Montreal Gazette newspapers, would earned at least $63,500 Canadian dollars that year, the top scale rate negotiated by the union, The Newspaper Guild-Communications Workers of America.[19] Given the gendered stratification of journalism, with more women working as freelancers than men, this disparity in income can be interpreted as a form of gender pay gap. The Professional Writers Association of Canada report showed no significant difference between the earnings of male and female freelancers, though part-time freelancers generally earned less than full-time freelancers.[20]
Working from home is often cited as an attractive feature of freelancing, yet research suggests working from home introduces new sets of constraints for the process of doing work, particularly for married women with families, who continue to bear the brunt of household chores and child care despite increases in their paid work time.[21] [22] Melissa Gregg's three-year ethnographic fieldwork work in Australia on information industry workers raises concerns over how both physical isolation and continuous access enabled with networked digital media puts pressure on workers to demonstrate their commitments through continual responses by email and to conceal their family or home life.[23]

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Correction to Algorithmic Theater

Hi guys,

Liz brought it to my attention that the links for the Algorithmic Theater manifesto that I was responding to (as well as the link to my response) no longer worked. 

In case any of you wanted to read the original piece, it is here: http://www.anniedorsen.com/useruploads/files/on_algorithmic_theatre.pdf

And if you want to see a 3 minute video clip of Annie Dorsen's algorithmic theater piece itself, look here: http://vimeo.com/15279806

See you tomorrow,
Yelena

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Wikistorm: Operation DATA

Well, what could be a more traditionally masculinist page within which to intervene?

DATA.

Between you (all) and me, the annoying thing about DATA (both the page on Wikipedia, and the concept as it is bandied about across departments) is the fact that it is presented as natural, unassailable, and without alternative. This is, incidentally, a legitimizing side effect of such rhetorical tactics as specifying the Latin or Greek etymological roots of a word (which is always done when Data is defined or described).

So I was positively gleeful when I "stormed" the Wikipedia page for DATA with the alternative notion of CAPTA. Capta, introduced in 1982 by Peter Checkland, is a notion of data that has been selected or interpreted, emphasizing the interpretive process. I thought it was great that it, too, is legitimized by the same Latin etymological tactics, creating a symmetry and therefore viable choice between data and capta. Here is the short paragraph I inserted as the third paragraph of the Wiki article. The link to the page is below:

"Though data is also increasingly used in humanities (particularly in the growing digital humanities), it has been suggested that the highly interpretive nature of humanities might be at odds with the ethos of data as given. Peter Checkland introduced the term capta (from the Latin capere, “to take”) to distinguish between an immense number of possible data and a sub-set of them, to which attention is oriented <link>. Johanna Drucker has argued that since the humanities affirm knowledge production as “situated, partial, and constitutive,” using data may introduce assumptions that are counterproductive, for example that phenomena are discreet or are observer-independent <link>. The term capta, which emphasizes the act of observation as constitutive, is offered as an alternative for the humanities."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data

If you notice my shout out to Johanna Drucker in the above, it is because 1. she is an incredibly smart and influential scholar pushing against the scientistic trends in data visualization in digital humanities, 2. she is both a scholar and practicing poet and book artist, and 3. she is going to be speaking at UCSD on Friday! Information below:


Friday, May 17 will be the final event in our Digital Humanities Lunch Speaker Series, featuring Johanna Drucker from the Department of Information Studies at UCLA.
TOPIC: "What Is The Humanistic Method In Digital Humanities?"
12:00-1:30 p.m., Seuss Room, Geisel Library


See you on Wednesday,
>Yelena

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Producing a boundary object is itself a boundary object. To borrow from a Foucauldian lexicon, it is the doing, as well as the structures that shape what is "doable" in a given situation, that is central to boundary objecthood. In framing that production, we discovered collaboration exists within the dynamic push/pull, give/take of minds and bodies working in tandem — against, within and beyond the confines of pedagogical and institutional structures. For our boundary event, we decided to plan a zinefest: a one-night collaboration with any and all interested individuals. We hoped for a sharing of experiences, ideas and moments of affective convergence. Planning, participating and preserving an event such as a zinefest requires myriad intersecting and disparate forms of knowledge. Through this process, there have been multiple (dis)ruptures, (dis)connections, and moments of seeming (im)possibility. Below is the proposal outlining our boundary object and its feminist theoretical framework. This was sent to Michelle Hyun, curator of the University Art Gallery:

"We are a collective of scholars working at the intersection of feminist technocultures, disability studies, and embodied scholarship at the University of California, San Diego. In association with UCFemTechNet, a UC-wide interdisciplinary working group supported by the UC Humanities Research Institute, we investigate questions of knowledge production, temporality, and memory-making.

Cultural productions -- films, art works, comics -- are often centered on the lone virtuoso who sees the completion of a project from its inception to its completion. In opposition to such singular perspectivism, embodied knowing privileges the multiplicities of memory-building practices, the writing of history, the creation of objects, and the telling of stories from multiple subject positions. It is at this conceptual nexus of partiality and embodiment that our project is situated. Our current project centers on the technoscientific notions of "archive" and "access" and the relational histories they share both within and beyond the sites of the academy. Both terms conjure up epistemic and ontological inquiries that are central to our collective: What does it mean to know? How do institutional forms of knowledge intersect or (dis)connect with forms of knowledge outside the walls of academia? How is collective memory-making connected to material practices in cross-disciplinary spaces of engagement?

As a means of practicing a mode of collective doing, we are inviting members of the public to engage in an evening of collective storytelling and memory-making across and between intersubjective bodies. Using the site of the gallery as a locus of potential creative activity, we will spend a 3-hour period constructing a fanzine in tandem with other bodies, beings, and modes of knowing particular to each attendant. Collaborating with others, visitors will make/construct/draw/write their own zine pages in response to the ideas of “archive” and “access” that often cultivate discourses of (dis)connection, (im)mobility, (de)fragmentation, (dis)ability and (un)knowing. Additionally, disposable cameras will be provided for participants as a means of documenting the event and the activities performed during the night, further illustrating the commitment to distributed, partial modes of remembering and documentation that are central to projects of feminist pedagogy and praxis."


 - FemSociality, a collective

Update on work in progress

Hi all! I wanted to update you on my work on Wikipedia. I decided to create a page for Tiziana Terranova, but it's all in Sandbox. I'm working on it, and will update when it is live.

Monday, May 6, 2013

WikiStorming Entries

I will admit being overcome with excitement to become a Wikipedia editor. After getting fired up by Adrienne Wadewitz' talk, I was thoroughly looking forward to being a part of [hopefully] helping to improve the site and decreasing the gender gap even slightly.

Expecting to plunge into the unbalanced labyrinth of words and "facts," blazing a trail of feminist triumph [and likely failure at the hands of quick-to-delete fellow editors], I rallied for an all-day editing bonanza. However, after some time spent combing through numerous pages to no editing avail, I realized a few of the difficulties inherent to the process. Looking to improve articles requires seeing what is not there — a talent in itself. Then you have to be familiar enough with the subject to make interventions that are worthwhile and will withstand competing fingers posed at the ready to undo. Adopting the succinctly informative but wholly unopinionated lingo of Wiki was also a somewhat arduous task [for me, at least, as I tend toward littering every sentence with adjectives]. It turns out the path to trailblazing is itself somewhat complicated to traverse.

Ultimately, I was no super editor, leaping patriarchal Wiki exclusions in a single bound. But I did achieve small edits, that have not been removed after more than a week. Now that I have the hang of the technical aspects and a more realistic understanding of the process, I hope to make many more edits.

I added information to the Sally Mann article. She's one of the most lauded American women photographers in the art form's history. I saw her speak with another highly-regarded woman photographer in what was one of the most incredible discussions on what it means to be a woman in photography I've ever been privy to. The links I included with the edit take the reader to a transcript of the talk, so hopefully some other young female photographer will be inspired by their candid words.

And I copy edited the Electronic Civil Disobedience article, which was riddled with grammatical errors.





















Wednesday, May 1, 2013

My Wikipedia Entry

There seems to be a fascination with "prosthesis" in this class, but the wikipedia entry for prosthesis (except for a thanks to Cristina and Louise's edit) is a total mess! I only got started cleaning it up. The seven "Celtiknot" edits are mine, limited to the intro and "Type" section:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prosthesis&action=history

Much more could be done. I would like to spend more time on the "cosmesis" and "cost" sections - including changing those headings.
Revising the headings was an interesting exercise - I probably overdid it, but I felt that the initial state of limiting the Types to 4 kinds of extremity prostheses gives preferential treatment to biomechanical approaches to prosthetic technology without accounting for the amputees whose loss requires non-powered devices. This mentality marginalizes aesthetic (passive) devices as non-functional, and does a disservice to amputees who actually use their aesthetic devices as a passive assist. Even myoelectric wearers will use their devices 75% of the time (or more) as a passive assist. It also erases most of the amputee population: finger amputees account for about 88% or the upper extremity amputee population.
My blog post also focuses on the current issues around "cosmetic" as a prosthetic category, because of funding issues.
It is also worth thinking about the gendering of the prosthetic field: male/prosthetists/biomechanical/active-functional vs female/anaplastologists/cosmetic/passive-[functional?]

-Erin/drledford/celtiknot

Artist and Engineer Prosthetic Collaborations Complicated by "Cosmetic"

Hi All,

My blog post is still under review by the administrator, so I will post now while that is pending. My post was in response to this article:
http://rhizome.org/editorial/2012/oct/4/inside-prosthetic-imaginary-interview-sara-hendren/

I am very pleased that these topics are all under the Abler umbrella. I find your assemblage and discussion very compelling. I do have some questions in regards to the potential collaborations of artists and prosthetic engineers in light of the practical limitations of contemporary prosthetic technologies and their purchase. Also because of the plight of amputee's access to prosthetic healthcare, I am concerned with the use of the metaphor "prosthetic". It is used often in artistic and academic frames in contexts that stretch the medical origin, perhaps to the extent that we think: "amputees wear prosthetics" as a given. In fact, many amputees don't because they do not have access to prosthetic technology. 

I ask because in the public eye there are often misconceptions about what a prosthesis can do and also about how many amputees there really are in the US. This means there is virtually no money in industry to fund this collaborative design work - the government is the funding lifeline.
http://www.utne.com/Science-Technology/Building-Better-Arm-An-amputee-helps-engineer.aspx

In cross-specialty conversations you've observed, has it been considered that the government's PR mechanism of enlisting the "possibility" of artist/prosthetist/engineer collaboration to steer focus away from DARPA's failure to include a new realistic covering for their prototype arms: Johns Hopkins consortium? They ran out of money and just used the current silicone glove technology available. It has many failings. 

There is a very big issue with technology's failure to create or even fund prosthetic skin. The silicone lifelike options that do exist have always been described in medical texts as "cosmetic" and having no function. 

Last year, Medicare pulled funding for custom "cosmetic" prosthetic coverings and complete cosmetic prostheses. Medicaid and many state children's services have followed suite. Children in California on state aid cannot get ear prostheses because they are considered "cosmetic". 

I understand that there are many different purposes for artistic production of prostheses, but one purpose I would like to offer up for further contemplation. Are the artists who desire to collaborate with prosthetic engineers aware that their designs will be considered cosmetic and not actually make it to their intended user? (unless through charitable pathways) 


I hope this generates some useful discussion. Thank you so much for establishing this forum and putting these groups in conversation.
I'm getting addicted to Wikistorming!! And good news is that Wikipedia went into my modifications and fixed some of my technical challenges for me, in addition to creating links from some of my words.

I added some new information to the Disability Art page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_Art

And below my additions in orange once again.


Development of the concept of disability arts in other countries

Non-profit, government-funded organizations dedicated to providing resources and support towards activities in disability art are numerous in countries like Australia and Canada. In Australia, such organizations include Arts Access Australia (peak body), Accessible Arts (NSW), DADAA (WA), Arts Access Victoria (VIC) and more.[21] In Canada, organizations include Arts & Disability Network Manitoba, Kickstart Arts - disability arts and culture and Abilities Arts Festival.[22] These organizations work to increase opportunities and access for people with disability as artists, arts-workers, participants and audiences. They offer services to their members, such as representation and advocacy, facilitation and development, information and advice, grants and more. Many of these organizations use the Social model of disability, thus they use the term ‘disability’ to refer to barriers, rather than medical conditions or impairments. They might categorize ‘people with disability’, to mean anyone with sensory or physical impairments, hidden impairments, intellectual impairments, learning difficulties or mental health conditions. These organizations recognise and value the culture and language of the Deaf community, and include them within this definition in regognition of the similar barriers that many deaf people face accessing the arts. [21]

References

  1. ^ "What is Disability Arts?". Shape. Retrieved 09 February 2012.
  2. ^ "This is based on an assumption that nothing is written about Marc Quinn being disabled at the point of make this work.".
  3. a b Bragg, Melvyn (11 December 2007). "The last remaining avant-garde movement"Society Guardian. Retrieved 18 September 2010.
  4. ^ Marc, Quinn (15 September 2005). "Marc Quinn's Alison Lapper Pregnant unveiled in Trafalgar Square"Press Release. Greater London Authority. Retrieved 09 February 2012.
  5. ^ "effective, defective, creative". Science Museum. Retrieved 09 February 2012.
  6. ^ Storr, Robert (2008). "Chuck Close". MOMA. Retrieved 09 February 2012.
  7. a b c "What is Disability Arts?". Disability Arts Cymru. Retrieved 09 February 2012.
  8. ^ Allan, Sutherland (1 July 2005). "What is Disability Arts?". Disability Arts Online. Retrieved 09 February 2012.
  9. a b c Allan, Sutherland (22 July 2008). "Disability Arts Chronology: 1977 - 2003". Disability Arts Online. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  10. ^ "What is Disability Arts?". Edward Lear Foundation. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  11. ^ Ollie, Chase (15 December 2008). "LDAF: So much more than a charity case". BBC. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  12. ^ "Disability Discrimination Act 1995". The National Archives. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  13. ^ Aaron, Williamson (2011). "In the Ghetto? A Polemic in Place of an Editorial". Serpentine Gallery; Edited Aaron Williamson. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  14. ^ Lennard J., Davis (2011). "The Disability Paradox: Ghettoisation of the Visual". Serpentine Gallery; Edited Aaron Williamson. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  15. ^ "National Disability Arts Collection and Archive". National Disability Arts Collection and Archive Co-op. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  16. ^ Ju, Gosling (2006). "What is Disability Arts?". Holton Lee. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  17. ^ "VSA The International Organization on Art and Disability". The Kennedy Center. 2013. Retrieved April 30 2013.
  18. ^ "Creative Growth". 2013. Retrieved April 30 2013.
  19. ^ "Bodies of Work". 2013. Retrieved April 30 2013.
  20. ^ "Smithsonian Institute Profile page, National Museum of American History". 2013. Retrieved April 30 2013. }}
  21. a b "Arts Access Australia". 2013. Retrieved May 1 2013. }}
  22. ^ "Kickstart arts". 2013. Retrieved May 1 2013. }}

External links